ReviewCells2025
Epithelial Dysfunction in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Mechanisms, Models and Emerging Therapies.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia research models: evolution and insights from the past three decades.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a complex disorder whereby improper formation of the diaphragm allows herniation of the internal organs into the thoracic cavity, resulting in pulmonary hypoplasia among other complications. Although epithelial dysfunction is central to CDH pathology, relatively little attention has been paid to the underlying mechanisms orchestrating epithelial malfunction. Proinflammatory signaling downstream of impaired mechanotransduction due to in utero lung compression has been elucidated to drive epithelial cell phenotypes. This has been illustrated by a reduction in nuclear YAP and the upregulation of NF-kB in CDH models. In this review, we draw from recent findings using emerging technologies to examine epithelial cell mechanisms in CDH and discuss the role of compression as a central and, crucially, sufficient driver of CDH phenotypes. In recognition of the limitations of using genetic knockout models to recapitulate such a heterogenic and etiologically complicated disease, we discuss alternative models such as the established nitrofen rat model, air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures, organoids and ex vivo lung explants. Throughout, we acknowledge the importance of involving mechanical compression in the modeling of CDH in order to faithfully recapitulate the disease. Finally, we explore novel therapeutic strategies from stem cell and regenerative therapies to precision medicine and the importance of defining CDH endotypes in order to guide treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.