ReviewCells2025
Perspectives of Targeting Autophagy as an Adjuvant to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reprogramming Autophagy to Strengthen Antitumour Immunity: Advances in Immunotherapeutic Strategies.Immunology · 2026Review
- Comparison and analysis of the immune landscape at the tumour invasion front in patients with pMMR/MSI-H and pMMR/MSS colorectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Understanding the Tumor Microenvironmental Mechanisms Driving Immunotherapy Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Targeting the autophagic network: A new frontier in colorectal cancer chemotherapy response.CytoJournal · 2026Article
- Role of autophagy‑modulating long non‑coding RNAs in tumor radioresistance (Review).Oncology reports · 2025Review
- Turning cold tumors into hot tumors to ignite immunotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Advances in the Use of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.OncoTargets and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world, with increasing incidence and mortality rates. Standard conventional treatments for CRC are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Recently, immunotherapy has been introduced as a promising alternative to CRC treatment that utilizes patients' immune system to combat cancer cells. The beneficial effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically anti-PD-1/ PD-L1, has been ascribed to the abundance of DNA replication errors that result in the formation of neoantigens. Such neoantigens serve as distinct flags that amplify the immune response when checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are administered. DNA replication errors in CRC patients are expressed as two statuses: the first is the deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) with a higher overall immune response and survival rate than the second status of patients with proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR). There is a limitation to using anti-PD-1/PD-L1 as it is only confined to MSI-H/dMMR, where there is an abundance of T-cell inhibitory ligands (PD-L1). This calls for investigating new therapeutic interventions to widen the scope of ICIs' role in the treatment of CRC. Autophagy modulation provides a good example. Autophagy is a cellular process that plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and has been studied for its impact on tumor development, progression, and response to treatment. In this review, we aim to highlight autophagy as a potential determinant in tumor immune response and to study the impact of autophagy on the tumor immune microenvironment. Moreover, we aim to investigate the value of a combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents with autophagy modulators as an adjuvant therapeutic approach for CRC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.