ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Nano/Micro-Enabled Modification and Innovation of Conventional Adjuvants for Next-Generation Vaccines.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review on vaccine developmental approaches: Evaluating efficacy, and addressing challenges of infectious diseases in the post-COVID-19 era.Virus research · 2026Pooled it
- Bioinspired Cross-Linked Anionic Hydrogel Microparticles as Potential Adjuvants for Safe Vaccines: Colloidal-Chemical Characteristics, Morphology and Biological Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A lymph node-targeted cell-nanoadjuvant conjugate enhances dendritic cell-T cell crosstalk for cancer immunotherapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- Nanoadjuvant-integrated organic biomaterials for immune engineering: Mechanisms, design strategies, and translational applications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Nano-adjuvants enhance the immunogenicity and safety of infectious bursal disease virus vaccines: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global spread of infectious diseases has raised public awareness of vaccines, highlighting their essential role in protecting public health. Among the components of modern vaccines, adjuvants have received increasing attention for boosting immune responses and enhancing efficacy. Recent advancements in adjuvant research, particularly nanodelivery systems, have paved the way for developing more effective and safer adjuvants. This review outlines the properties, progress, and mechanisms of FDA-approved conventional adjuvants, focusing on their contributions to and challenges in vaccine success. Despite these advancements, conventional adjuvants still face suboptimal immunomodulatory effects, potential side effects, and limitations in targeting specific immune pathways. Nanodelivery systems have emerged as a transformative approach in adjuvant design, offering unique advantages such as enhancing vaccine stability, enabling controlled antigen release, and inducing specific immune responses. By addressing these limitations, nanocarriers improve the safety and efficacy of conventional adjuvants and drive the development of next-generation adjuvants for complex diseases. This review also explores strategies for incorporating nanodelivery systems into adjuvant development, emphasizing its role in optimizing vaccine formulations. By summarizing current challenges and recent advances, this review aims to provide valuable insights guiding future efforts in designing innovative adjuvants that meet the evolving needs of global immunization programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.