ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Enhancing the Physical Properties of Calcium Silicate Cement Modified with Elastin-like Polypeptides and Bioactive Glass.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Marginal Adaptability of Harvard MTA and Biodentine Used as Root-End Filling Material: A Comparative SEM Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- New Glass-Ceramics in the System CaMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional calcium silicate cement (CSC) formulations often exhibit insufficient mechanical strength and low initial stability. This study aimed to develop an organic-inorganic hybrid biomaterial by incorporating an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) (V125E8) and bioactive glass (BG) (63S) into CSC to improve its mechanical properties and wash-out resistance during the initial setting. Experimental groups included ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Sirona, USA) as a control (0BG), inorganic hybrids containing BG (2% or 5%; 2BG, 5BG), and organic-inorganic hybrids combining BG (2% or 5%; 2BG-L, 5BG-L) with a 10 wt% ELP solution. The compressive strength, microhardness, and wash-out resistance of the specimens were evaluated. The organic-inorganic hybrid groups (2BG-L and 5BG-L) exhibited significantly higher compressive strength and microhardness than the control (0BG) and inorganic-only groups (2BG and 5BG). Additionally, the incorporation of ELP markedly improved wash-out resistance, minimizing material disintegration during the initial setting in aqueous environments. The organic-inorganic hybrid groups (2BG-L and 5BG-L) exhibited significantly higher compressive strength and microhardness than the control (0BG) and inorganic-only groups (2BG and 5BG). Additionally, the incorporation of ELP markedly improved wash-out resistance, minimizing material disintegration during the initial setting in aqueous environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.