ReviewMetabolites2025
From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Applications of Metabolomics in Glioblastoma.
Review in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Towards non-invasive diagnosis of glioblastoma: identifying metabolic biomarkers in liquid biopsies using a ROC-based approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesIn recent years, interest in studying changes in cancer metabolites has resulted in significant advances in the metabolomics field. Glioblastoma remains the most aggressive and lethal brain malignancy, which presents with notable metabolic reprogramming.
methodsWe performed literature research from the PubMed database and considered research articles focused on the key metabolic pathways altered in glioblastoma (e.g., glycolysis, lipid metabolism, TCA cycle), the role of oncometabolites and metabolic plasticity, and the differential expression of metabolites in glioblastoma. Currently used metabolomics approaches can be either targeted, focusing on specific metabolites and pathways, or untargeted, which involves data-driven exploration of the metabolome and also results in the identification of new metabolites. Data processing and analysis is of great importance and can be improved with the integration of machine learning approaches for metabolite identification.
resultsChanges in α/β-glucose, lactate, choline, and 2-hydroxyglutarate were detected in glioblastoma compared with non-tumor tissues. Different metabolites such as fumarate, tyrosine, and leucine, as well as citric acid, isocitric acid, shikimate, and GABA were detected in blood and CSF, respectively.
conclusionsAlthough promising new technological and bioinformatic approaches help us understand glioblastoma better, challenges associated with biomarker availability, tumor heterogeneity, interpatient variability, standardization, and reproducibility still remain. Metabolomics research, either alone or combined with genomics or proteomics (i.e., multiomics) in glioblastoma, can lead to biomarker identification, tracking of metabolic therapy response, discovery of novel metabolites and pathways, and identification of potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.