Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40422872›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2025

From Biomarker Discovery to Clinical Applications of Metabolomics in Glioblastoma.

Neja Šamec, Gloria Krapež, Cene Skubic, Ivana Jovčevska, Alja Videtič Paska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neja ŠamecCentre for Functional Genomics and Biochips, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-1931
Gloria KrapežCentre for Functional Genomics and Biochips, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-8642-4693
Cene SkubicCentre for Functional Genomics and Biochips, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivana JovčevskaCentre for Functional Genomics and Biochips, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-2986
Alja Videtič PaskaCentre for Functional Genomics and Biochips, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška Cesta 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-5417

Funding

The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P1-0390The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency Young Investigator Grant awarded to G. K.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesIn recent years, interest in studying changes in cancer metabolites has resulted in significant advances in the metabolomics field. Glioblastoma remains the most aggressive and lethal brain malignancy, which presents with notable metabolic reprogramming.

methodsWe performed literature research from the PubMed database and considered research articles focused on the key metabolic pathways altered in glioblastoma (e.g., glycolysis, lipid metabolism, TCA cycle), the role of oncometabolites and metabolic plasticity, and the differential expression of metabolites in glioblastoma. Currently used metabolomics approaches can be either targeted, focusing on specific metabolites and pathways, or untargeted, which involves data-driven exploration of the metabolome and also results in the identification of new metabolites. Data processing and analysis is of great importance and can be improved with the integration of machine learning approaches for metabolite identification.

resultsChanges in α/β-glucose, lactate, choline, and 2-hydroxyglutarate were detected in glioblastoma compared with non-tumor tissues. Different metabolites such as fumarate, tyrosine, and leucine, as well as citric acid, isocitric acid, shikimate, and GABA were detected in blood and CSF, respectively.

conclusionsAlthough promising new technological and bioinformatic approaches help us understand glioblastoma better, challenges associated with biomarker availability, tumor heterogeneity, interpatient variability, standardization, and reproducibility still remain. Metabolomics research, either alone or combined with genomics or proteomics (i.e., multiomics) in glioblastoma, can lead to biomarker identification, tracking of metabolic therapy response, discovery of novel metabolites and pathways, and identification of potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

biomarkerdiagnosismetabolomemultiomic integrationomicsprecision oncologytherapytumor metabolic reprogramming

Identifiers

PMID40422872
PMCPMC12112835

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.