Evidence mapPaperPMID 40422941Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Treatment Options in Isolated Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Disease.

Stephanie Rassam, Raphaël Coscas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie RassamDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery of the Department of Heart, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6485-5062
Raphaël CoscasDepartment of Vascular Surgery, CHU Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 92104 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-2877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolated popliteal artery (PA) lesions account for around 1% of lower limb revascularisations. Whatever treatment modality is chosen, the effects on the artery during knee flexion must be considered. The decision between a less invasive endovascular treatment (EVT) and traditional open interventions remains complex due to anatomical, biomechanical, and pathophysiological considerations and the varying aetiology of PA lesions. Available data remain limited, making it more challenging to decide on the most effective and durable treatment approach. Nowadays, when EVT is planned, several non-stenting techniques are available, making a "leave-nothing-behind strategy" possible after adequate vessel preparation. If stent implantation is required, self-expanding vasculomimetic stents are preferred due to their ability to provide flexibility and resist compression during motion. This narrative review discusses the available treatment options, challenges, and specific considerations for isolated PA disease, highlighting the need for large-scale, high-quality studies to provide more robust evidence on the optimal treatment approach.

Indexed as

angiographydigital subtractionendovascular proceduresperipheral arterial diseasepopliteal arteryvascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID40422941
PMCPMC12112637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.