ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Therapeutic Management of LDL-C: Efficacy and Economic Impact Assessment.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Non-statin Lipid Therapies: A Narrative Review of Evolving Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the largest global disease burdens. Despite guidelines and recommendations and the proven advantages of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in preventing CVD, achieving treatment targets remains disappointing. A key barrier to optimal LLT is therapy discontinuation. To be widely adopted in clinical practice, new lipid-lowering therapies must both prevent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and exhibit cost effectiveness to ensure widespread utilization by patients, physicians, and insurers. While non-statin LLTs have shown cardiovascular value, their cost effectiveness is controversial. This review highlights the LLTs that are currently widely adopted and summarizes the available evidence on their cost effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.