Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40423252›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025

Real-Time Detection of Meningiomas by Image Segmentation: A Very Deep Transfer Learning Convolutional Neural Network Approach.

Debasmita Das, Chayna Sarkar, Biswadeep Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debasmita DasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore Campus, Tiruvalam Road, Katpadi, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chayna SarkarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS), Mawdiangdiang, Shillong 793018, Meghalaya, India.
Biswadeep DasDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Virbhadra Road, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3222-2527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesDeveloping a treatment strategy that effectively prolongs the lives of people with brain tumors requires an accurate diagnosis of the condition. Therefore, improving the preoperative classification of meningiomas is a priority. Machine learning (ML) has made great strides thanks to the development of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and computer-aided tumor detection systems. The deep convolutional layers automatically extract important and dependable information from the input space, in contrast to more traditional neural network layers. One recent and promising advancement in this field is ML. Still, there is a dearth of studies being carried out in this area.

methodsTherefore, starting with the analysis of magnetic resonance images, we have suggested in this research work a tried-and-tested and methodical strategy for real-time meningioma diagnosis by image segmentation using a very deep transfer learning CNN model or DNN model (VGG-16) with CUDA. Since the VGGNet CNN model has a greater level of accuracy than other deep CNN models like AlexNet, GoogleNet, etc., we have chosen to employ it. The VGG network that we have constructed with very small convolutional filters consists of 13 convolutional layers and 3 fully connected layers. Our VGGNet model takes in an sMRI FLAIR image input. The VGG's convolutional layers leverage a minimal receptive field, i.e., 3 × 3, the smallest possible size that still captures up/down and left/right. Moreover, there are also 1 × 1 convolution filters acting as a linear transformation of the input. This is followed by a ReLU unit. The convolution stride is fixed at 1 pixel to keep the spatial resolution preserved after convolution. All the hidden layers in our VGG network also use ReLU. A dataset consisting of 264 3D FLAIR sMRI image segments from three different classes (meningioma, tuberculoma, and normal) was employed. The number of epochs in the Sequential Model was set to 10. The Keras layers that we used were Dense, Dropout, Flatten, Batch Normalization, and ReLU.

resultsAccording to the simulation findings, our suggested model successfully classified all of the data in the dataset used, with a 99.0% overall accuracy. The performance metrics of the implemented model and confusion matrix for tumor classification indicate the model's high accuracy in brain tumor classification.

conclusionsThe good outcomes demonstrate the possibility of our suggested method as a useful diagnostic tool, promoting better understanding, a prognostic tool for clinical outcomes, and an efficient brain tumor treatment planning tool. It was demonstrated that several performance metrics we computed using the confusion matrix of the previously used model were very good. Consequently, we think that the approach we have suggested is an important way to identify brain tumors.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansbrain tumorconvolutional neural networks (CNNs)machine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmeningiomaradiomicsvery deep transfer learningVGG-16

Identifiers

PMID40423252
PMCPMC12115478

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.