SynthesisActa dermato-venereologica2025
Time to Disease Control with Dupilumab for Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dupilumab in patients with bullous pemphigoid and concomitant atopy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a chronic autoimmune blistering disease primarily affecting the elderly population. While awaiting the results from randomized clinical trials to assess the effect of dupilumab in patients with BP, clinicians have begun to introduce dupilumab into their therapeutic arsenal, with few data supporting their clinical decisions. The objectives were to assess time to disease control, predictors of response, achievement of disease control, disease recurrence, and occurrence of adverse events. Randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) from Medline and Embase were reviewed. A total of 315 studies were identified and 5 NRSIs (167 participants with moderate-to-severe BP) meeting our inclusion criteria were found. Dupilumab was significantly associated with shorter time to disease control compared with the control group (HR 2.71 [95% CI, 1.85-3.96; I2 = 35%; 127 participants; 4 studies]). The overall strength of the evidence was graded as very low due to serious risk of bias and imprecision of effect measures. There were insufficient data to inform conclusions regarding BP recurrence and adverse events. Evidence was found that dupilumab reduces time to disease control in BP. It was not possible to assess predictors of response using pre-planned meta-regression. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine dupilumab's place in therapeutic algorithms for BP. PROSPERO number: CRD42024599235.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.