ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Area Under the Curve Analysis in a Real-World Cohort of Finnish Patients Treated for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluid Volumes Longitudinal Modeling to Predict Atrophy and Fibrosis in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Cerebral perfusion pressure trajectories and cumulative exposure metrics predict in-hospital mortality in acute brain injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the area under the curve (AUC) measures from visual acuity (VA) trajectories in describing outcomes for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods: AUC analysis on 93 patients with nAMD was performed using VA trajectories up to 12 months for the purpose of illustration. The broken stick model was first used to interpolate VA trajectories at prespecified times from uneven timepoints over the 4 year period. The AUC measures used were: general VA (AUCG; the area above 20 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters), change from baseline (AUCI), and adjusted AUC (Adj AUC) to adjust the change from baseline with respect to the ceiling (85 letters) and the ground (20 letters). We studied how AUC ranking of outcomes differed from VA change from baseline and how AUC-derived parameters correlated with known prognostic factors, such as baseline VA, and optical coherence tomography findings at baseline and during treatment. Results: Median AUCIs in ascending quartiles of baseline VA were 88, 116, 38, and 10, respectively. The corresponding Adj AUCs were 0.12, 0.28, 0.13 and 0.29 (scale -1 to +1), suggesting a compensation for the ceiling effect. Median AUCIs in patients with baseline intraretinal, intraretinal + subretinal, or subretinal fluid were 40, 50, or 59, respectively. The corresponding Adj AUCIs were 0.14, 0.19, and 0.23, both showing the expected response to baseline fluid status. Conclusions: Using the measures described here, modifiers of VA change and different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment protocols can be compared from only one to three of the AUC values even in materials with uneven evaluation points. Translational Relevance: AUC-based analysis provides new tools to evaluate the effectiveness of nAMD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.