ArticleActa diabetologica2025
Predictive factors of major amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated by peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes of autologous cell therapy in patients with ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers and no-option chronic limb threatening ischaemia.Acta diabetologica · 2026Observational
- Predicting major amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcers using comparative machine learning models for enhanced clinical decision-making.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimPeripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) therapy is an adjuvant treatment for patients with ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI). This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing the effectiveness of PB-MNC therapy.
methodThis prospective, not controlled study included a cohort of patients with DFUs and NO-CLI treated by PB-MNCs. NO-CLI was defined as the revascularization failure with desert foot (absence of any artery below-the-ankle) or partial desert foot (absence of a wound-related artery with TcPO RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Sixty-four patients were included. The mean age was 73.8 ± 5.8 years, 75% were male, and all of them had type 2 diabetes. At one year of follow-up, major amputation was documented in 12.5% of patients. Amputees had a higher rate of desert foot (vs. partial desert foot) (100% vs. 25%, p < 0.0001), higher post-procedural pain (5.7 ± 1.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001), lower TcPO
conclusionPB-MNCs therapy resulted less effective in patients with complete desert foot, persistence of paint after therapy, heel involvement in persons with multiple ulcers, and impaired walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.