Evidence mapPaperPMID 40423800Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2025

Personalized therapy in multiple sclerosis: an Italian Delphi consensus.

Claudio Gasperini, Diego Centonze, Antonella Conte, Paolo Gallo, Alessandra Lugaresi, Francesco Patti, Maria Trojano, Maria Pia Amato, Massimo Filippi

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claudio GasperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, S Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Diego CentonzeDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Antonella ConteIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy.
Paolo GalloDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Alessandra LugaresiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco PattiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, GF Ingrassia, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Maria TrojanoDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neurosciences-DiBraiN, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Maria Pia Amato *Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Massimo Filippi *Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. filippi.massimo@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5485-0479

Funding

Merck CroosRef Funder ID 009504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe increasing availability of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) may provide more personalized treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) based on various factors, including patients' characteristics, prognostic indicators, comorbidities, and safety. In Italy, recent efforts focused on promoting interdisciplinary, patient-centered care and equitable access to optimized therapies, as reported in the 2023 Barometer of Multiple Sclerosis and Related Diseases from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Association. A key challenge is ensuring equitable access to homogeneous and personalized therapeutic strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing a Delphi methodology, a panel of Italian neurologists with expertise in MS evaluated consensus on specific aspects of MS treatments, including personalized therapy, patient involvement in decision-making, treatment flexibility, self-management of therapies, perception of treatment efficacy and safety and therapeutic sequence management.

resultsOf 166 votes, 116 statements reached consensus (68% positive, 2% negative), representing 70% of the total, whereas 50 (30%) highlighted areas of non-consensus. The findings emphasize the central role of neurologists, the importance of personalized therapy, the inclusion of patients in therapeutic choices to enhance adherence and quality of life, and managing both quality of life and caregiver burden. Most high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (HE DMTs), like cladribine and anti-CD20 therapies, recognized for their efficacy and convenience of administration, received positive consensus, emphasizing their perceived value in individualized treatment approaches.

conclusionsThis research highlights best practices and provides a roadmap for improving patient outcomes through tailored, well-communicated therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisPrecision MedicineDelphi TechniqueHumansItalyMaleNeurologistsDelphiMultiple sclerosisPersonalized treatment

Identifiers

PMID40423800
PMCPMC12116865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.