ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
Development of an Adaptive, Economical, and Easy-to-Use SP3-TMT Automated Sample Preparation Workflow for Quantitative Proteomics.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public Cohort Analysis Identifies Thyroglobulin Variants as Hypothyroidism Risk Factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid handling robots have been developed to automate various steps of the bottom-up proteomics workflow, however, protocols for the generation of isobarically labeled peptides remain limited. Existing methods often require costly specialty devices and are constrained by fixed workflows. To address this, we developed a cost-effective, flexible, automated sample preparation protocol for TMT-labeled peptides using the Biomek i5 liquid handler (Beckman Coulter). Our approach leverages single-pot solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation with paramagnetic beads to streamline protein cleanup and digestion. The protocol also allows for adjustment of trypsin concentration and peptide-to-TMT ratio to increase throughput and reduce costs, respectively. We compared our automated and manual 18-plex TMT-Pro labeling workflows by monitoring select protein markers of the unfolded protein response in pharmacologically activatable, engineered cell lines. Overall, the automated protocol demonstrated equivalent performance in peptide and protein identifications, digestion and labeling efficiency, and an enhancement in the dynamic range of TMT quantifications. Compared to the manual method, the Biomek protocol significantly reduces hands-on time and minimizes sample handling errors. The 96-well format additionally allows for the number of TMT reactions to be scaled up quickly without a significant increase in user interaction. Our optimized automated workflow enhances throughput, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness, making it a valuable tool for high-throughput proteomics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.