Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424023›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Exploring the Application Capability of ChatGPT as an Instructor in Skills Education for Dental Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Siyu Huang, Chang Wen, Xueying Bai, Sihong Li, Shuining Wang, Xiaoxuan Wang, Dong Yang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06942130 (Model Construction for AI-assisted Teaching), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06942130 nacompletednot on this map

Model Construction for AI-assisted Teaching

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital of Stomatology, Wuhan UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled192ConditionsMedical EducationArmsArtificial intelligence, Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siyu Huang *State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1516-7333
Chang Wen *State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7748-9058
Xueying BaiState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3023-6969
Sihong LiState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8161-3389
Shuining WangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1482-0046
Xiaoxuan WangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3763-2939
Dong YangState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-9008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical operative skills training is a critical component of preclinical education for dental students. Although technology-assisted instruction, such as virtual reality and simulators, is increasingly being integrated, direct guidance from instructors remains the cornerstone of skill development. ChatGPT, an advanced conversational artificial intelligence model developed by OpenAI, is gradually being used in medical education.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effects of ChatGPT-assisted skill learning on performance, cognitive load, self-efficacy, learning motivation, and spatial ability, with the aim of evaluating the potential of ChatGPT in clinical operative skills education.

methodsIn this study, 187 undergraduate dental students recruited from a first-class university in China were randomly divided into a ChatGPT group and a blank control group. Among them, the control group used videos for skill acquisition, and the ChatGPT group used ChatGPT in addition to the videos. After 1 week of intervention, skills were tested using desktop virtual reality, and cognitive load was measured by recording changes in pupil diameter with an eye tracker. In addition, a spatial ability test was administered to analyze the effect of ChatGPT on those with different spatial abilities. Finally, a questionnaire was also used to assess cognitive load and self-efficacy during the learning process.

resultsA total of 192 dental undergraduates from a top-tier Chinese university were initially recruited for the experiment by October 25, 2024. Following eye-tracking calibration procedures, 5 participants were excluded, resulting in 187 eligible students successfully completing the experimental protocol by November 2, 2024. Following a short-term intervention administered through randomized allocation, superior performance (ChatGPT group: mean 73.12, SD 10.06; control group: mean 65.54, SD 12.48; P<.001) was observed among participants in the ChatGPT group, along with higher levels of self-efficacy (P=.04) and learning motivation (P=.02). In addition, cognitive load was lower in the ChatGPT group according to eye-tracking measures (ChatGPT group: mean 0.137, SD 0.036; control group: mean 0.312, SD 0.032; P<.001). The analysis of the learning performance of participants with different spatial abilities in the 2 modalities showed that compared to the learners with high spatial abilities (ChatGPT group: mean 76.58, SD 9.23; control group: mean 73.89, SD 11.75; P=.22), those with low spatial abilities (ChatGPT group: mean 70.20, SD 10.71; control group: mean 55.41, SD 13.31; P<.001) were more positively influenced by ChatGPT.

conclusionsChatGPT has performed outstandingly in assisting dental skill learning, and the study supports the integration of ChatGPT into skills teaching and provides new ideas for modernizing skill teaching.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06942130;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06942130.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical CompetenceEducation, DentalStudents, DentalAdultChinaFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleSelf EfficacyVirtual RealityYoung Adultartificial intelligenceChatGPTclinical skillscognitive loaddental educationmotivationrandomized controlled trialself-efficacyspatial abilityvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40424023
PMCPMC12152432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.