ArticlePloS one2025
The social representations of Covid-19 among primary health care' users in the Federal district, Brazil: A psychosocial approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brazil was one of the countries most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including severe psycho-social effects. This study aimed to analyze the Federal District Primary Health Care users' Social Representations (SR) regarding Covid-19 through exploration of the elements that comprise their field, identification of the variations of their prominence, as well as analyze the relations and differences among them according to their socio-demographic characteristics and the participants' exposure to the disease. It was based on the Moscovici theory of social representations. 1,714 users from the Federal District Primary Health Units regions participated in the study: Central-South, North, West, Southwest, East and South. For the data collection, the free evocation technique was used. The data were analyzed by the Iramuteq software in the prototypical modality, analyzing similitude and analyzing x2 test of the most prominent words, considering the socio-demographic and Covid-19 exposure variables, establishing p < 0.05. It has been found that the social representations of the pandemic among the Federal District PHC' users formed a dyad: doctor and death. It was observed, however, that the doctor-death relationship was organized according to the vulnerabilities present in the face of the pandemic context and the affective-emotional aspects, the most excluded social segments experiencing the terrifying feelings caused by the virus, particularly the confrontation with death and its consequences, along with the absence of hope. In particular, it was evident that the representation of an absent or omissive State, due to the lack of protective measures for people already socially excluded, who demanded agile, more equitable policies, configured from the perspective of bioethics a moral debt on the part of the State to this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.