ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Variant-specific priors clarify colocalisation analysis.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- LocusBlend: Flexible multi-index regional visualization of genomic association signals.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Advancing risk gene discovery across the allele frequency spectrum.HGG advances · 2026Review
- Shared genetic architecture of schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias implicates 16p11.2 and lifespan brain vulnerability.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor mediates peripheral-central neuroimmune crosstalk in autoimmune thyroid diseases.BMC medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Linking GWAS variants to their causal gene and context remains an ongoing challenge. A widely used method for performing this analysis is the coloc package for statistical colocalisation analysis, which can be used to link GWAS and eQTL associations. Currently, coloc assumes that all variants in a region are equally likely to be causal, despite the success of fine-mapping methods that use additional information to adjust their prior probabilities. In this paper we propose and implement an approach for specifying variant-specific prior probabilities in the coloc method. We describe and compare six source of information for specifying prior probabilities: non-coding constraint, enhancer-gene link scores, the output of the PolyFun method and three estimates of eQTL-TSS distance densities. Using simulations and analysis of ground-truth pQTL-eQTL colocalisations we show that variant-specific priors, particularly the eQTL-TSS distance density priors, can improve colocalisation performance. Furthermore, across GWAS-eQTL colocalisations variant-specific priors changed colocalisation significance in up to 14.1% of colocalisations, at some loci revealing the likely causal gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.