ArticlePLoS biology2025
Rhythm profiling using COFE reveals multi-omic circadian rhythms in human cancers in vivo.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythms and lung cancer biology and immunotherapy: Emerging opportunities and challenges.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Transcriptional noise sets fundamental limits to decoding circadian clock phase from single-cell RNA snapshots.iScience · 2026Article
- Quantification of circadian rhythms in mammalian lung tissue snapshot data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of ubiquitous circadian rhythms in human physiology requires regular measurements across time. Repeated sampling of the different internal tissues that house circadian clocks is both practically and ethically infeasible. Here, we present a novel unsupervised machine learning approach (COFE) that can use single high-throughput omics samples (without time labels) from individuals to reconstruct circadian rhythms across cohorts. COFE can simultaneously assign time labels to samples and identify rhythmic data features used for temporal reconstruction, while also detecting invalid orderings. With COFE, we discovered widespread de novo circadian gene expression rhythms in 11 different human adenocarcinomas using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The arrangement of peak times of core clock gene expression was conserved across cancers and resembled a healthy functional clock except for the mistiming of a few key genes. Moreover, rhythms in the transcriptome were strongly associated with the cancer-relevant proteome. The rhythmic genes and proteins common to all cancers were involved in metabolism and the cell cycle. Although these rhythms were synchronized with the cell cycle in many cancers, they were uncoupled with clocks in healthy matched tissue. The targets of most of FDA-approved and potential anti-cancer drugs were rhythmic in tumor tissue with different amplitudes and peak times. These findings emphasize the utility of considering "time" in cancer therapy, and suggest a focus on clocks in healthy tissue rather than free-running clocks in cancer tissue. Our approach thus creates new opportunities to repurpose data without time labels to study circadian rhythms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.