ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025
Association of Extended Steroid Treatment With Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: A National, Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of steroid treatment on mortality outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been widely demonstrated, while its effect on secondary infections, such as bloodstream infections (BSIs), is controversial. Recent studies have reported the survival benefits of using steroids for a standard duration compared to extended use, though their impact on the risk of BSIs remains debated. This study investigated whether extended steroid use is associated with the risk of BSIs and mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
methodsThis national multicenter retrospective study conducted at 22 university-affiliated hospitals evaluated the effect of steroid treatment duration in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with more than high-flow nasal cannula therapy. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of corticosteroid treatment: extended (> 10 days) and standard (≤ 10 days). Propensity score matching was performed by adjusting for covariates. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsAmong 1,114 patients, 378 with a hospital length of stay (LOS) exceeding 10 days were included. Each group of the propensity score-matched cohort had 189 patients, with no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups, except for the incidence of BSIs (extended group vs. standard group, 49.7% vs. 36.0%,
conclusionExtended steroid therapy was significantly associated with a higher incidence of BSIs in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.