Evidence mapPaperPMID 40425277Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2025

Six at Sixty. Commentary on osteogenesis imperfecta 1975-2025.

David Sillence

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David SillenceGenomic Medicine, University of Sydney Clinical School, Children's Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia david.sillence@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-2998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Between 1975 and 1977, my collaborators and I conducted a whole-of-population study in Victoria, Australia, examining the various presentations and clinical manifestations of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) and familial forms of bone fragility. In 1975, the prevailing view was that all presentations of OI reflected variable expression of pathogenic genomic variants at a single gene locus-possibly involving the recently identified protein, type I collagen. We concluded that OI was in fact genetically heterogeneous, setting the scene for future biochemical and genomic discoveries. Currently, OI is recognised to result from pathological variants in >20 genes, with variants in many further loci resulting in related forms of familial osteoporosis or special syndromes characterised by bone fragility. A dyadic nosology has been adopted to help clinicians, researchers and affected individuals in accessing OI diagnosis, treatment and research with a focus on precision medicine.

Indexed as

Collagen Type IOsteogenesis ImperfectaGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMutationCollagen Type Igenetic counselinggenetic heterogeneitygenetics, medicalgenomicsmusculoskeletal diseases

Identifiers

PMID40425277
PMCPMC12171489

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.