ArticleScientific reports2025
A qualitative analysis of Iranian consumers' perspectives on improving sausage quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite serious concerns regarding the health implications of sausage products, these items remain a staple in many families' diets. Considering the significant role of consumers in shaping the market and the direct impact of these products on individuals' health, the present study aimed to identify precise consumer expectations and practical strategies for improving the quality of these products. This qualitative research was conducted using semi-structured interviews. The study population consisted of adults aged 18-60 living in Tehran, the capital of Iran. To maximize demographic and geographic diversity across different regions of Tehran, purposive sampling was employed. A total of 43 individuals participated in this study. Data were analyzed thematically using MAXQDA2020 software. The findings revealed that the primary concerns of consumers regarding sausage products are related to their quality, health, and safety. Participants emphasized the importance of improving the health and safety of these products as the most critical strategy. The enhancement of sensory characteristics, the implementation of appropriate packaging, the promotion of honesty in labeling, and the rigorous oversight by regulatory authorities were identified as other measures that could contribute to this goal. The results of this study demonstrate that consumers seek higher-quality and safer sausage products. It is therefore the responsibility of producers to meet consumer expectations and fulfill their social responsibility to protect public health by enhancing production standards, using high-quality and natural raw materials, and providing accurate information to consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.