ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of coronary heart disease based on klotho levels using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnostic accuracy for coronary heart disease (CHD) needs to be improved. Some studies have indicated that klotho protein levels upon admission comprise an independent risk factor for CHD and have clinical value for predicting CHD. This study aimed to construct a tool to predict CHD risk by analyzing klotho levels and clinically relevant indicators by using a machine learning (ML) method. We randomly assigned the dataset of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2016 to training and test sets at a ratio of 70:30. We evaluated the ability of five models constructed using logistic regression, neural networks, random forest, support vector machine, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting to predict CHD. We determined their predictive performance using the following parameters: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, recall, F1, and Brier scores. We analyzed data from 11,583 persons in US NHANES and entered 13 potential predictive variables, including klotho and other clinically relevant indicators, into the feature screening process. We established that the five ML models could predict the onset of CHD. The RF model showed the best predictive performance among the five ML models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.