ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Development and validation of a new predictive model for the immune tolerance stage of chronic HBV infection based on the liver histopathological changes.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breastfeeding practices among hepatitis b-infected mothers: a prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance Induced by Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Chronic HBV Infection.Journal of immunology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify clinical and viral indicators for the development of a new model to accurately differentiate the stages of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on histopathological changes in the liver.
methodsClinical and liver pathology data from chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who underwent liver biopsy were retrospectively collected. The patients were allocated into test and validation groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was calculated to idneitfy the optimal diagnostic value for differentiating the stages of chronic HBV infection.
resultsA total of 118 patients and 73 patients who met the diagnostic and inclusion criteria were selected as the test group and validation group, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that HBeAg was independently correlated with the IT and IC stages. The cutoff value of HBeAg used to quantitatively differentiate between IT and IC was 1335 S/CO. The AUC values were 0.921 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.836-0.971) and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.726-0.967) in the test and validation groups, respectively. A new prediction model of the IT stage was established by using three indicators, namely, HBeAg, HBsAg and HBV DNA. The AUC values were 0.923 (95% CI: 0.864-0.982, p < 0.001) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.787-0.994, p < 0.01) in the test and validation groups, respectively, when this prediction model was used. For the new model, CMA guidelines (2019 version), EASL guidelines (2017 version) and AASLD guidelines (2018 version), the error rates in the test group were 4.65%, 11.62%, 23.26%, and 46.51%, respectively, while the errors rates in the validation group were 20.0%, 25.0%, 40.0%, and 45.0%, respectively.
conclusionsHigh levels of HBeAg, rather than HBeAg positivity, may serve as a predictor of the IT stage. A predictive model for the immune tolerance stage was established by combining three indicators. Compared with the recommended standards from multiple current guidelines, the new prediction model has a significantly lower error rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.