ArticleBMC oral health2025
Effect of radiation therapy on the dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful restorative procedures, particularly for patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy, rely on a robust adhesive interface. Since radiotherapy may alter dental tissues and compromise bonding, this study evaluated how the timing of radiation exposure affects the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a universal adhesive to dentin with different application modes.
methodsForty-two human third molars were used in this study. Mid-coronal dentin was prepared using a low-speed saw and polished with silicon carbide paper. The samples were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 6) according to the timing of radiation exposure (no radiation, control; radiation after restoration, F-RT; and radiation before restoration, RT-F). A single radiation dose of 70 Gy was administered to the samples after restoration (F-RT) and before restoration (RT-F). The samples were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the application mode of a universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal adhesive, 3 M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA): etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) mode. After adhesive application, the resin composite was constructed and stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. Six resin-bonded teeth per group were processed for the µTBS test. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's test (p < 0.05). Fractured surfaces were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Additional teeth were prepared for resin‒dentin interface observation (n = 1) and observed using an SEM.
resultsThe application mode of the universal adhesive had no influence on the µTBS of dentin, regardless of irradiation (p = 0.670). The µTBS values of the control groups were not significantly different from those of the F-RT group but were significantly higher than those of the RT-F group for both application modes. The resin‒dentin interfaces of the samples were similar among the control, F-RT and RT-F groups. More abundant and longer resin tags were observed when the universal adhesive was bonded in ER mode.
conclusionCompared with radiation after restoration, radiation before restoration resulted in an inferior bond strength. The application mode of a universal adhesive had no effect on the bond strength. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Restoration prior to the radiation procedure is an advisable strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.