ReviewBrain sciences2025
Assistive Artificial Intelligence in Epilepsy and Its Impact on Epilepsy Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global trends in epilepsy and the Chinese experience: Epidemiological transitions, underlying mechanisms, and integrated strategies (1990-2021).Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Improving the Management of People With Epilepsy in Low-and-Middle Income Countries.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial neural network-driven approaches to improved forecasting of disability care expenditures in an aging Kingdom of Saudi Arabia population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy, one of the most common neurological diseases in the world, affects around 50 million people, with a notably disproportionate prevalence in individuals residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Alarmingly, over 80% of annual epilepsy-related fatalities occur within LMICs. The burden of the disease assessed using Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) shows that epilepsy accounts for about 13 million DALYs per year, with LMICs bearing most of this burden due to the disproportionately high diagnostic and treatment gaps. Furthermore, LMICs also endure a significant financial burden, with the cost of epilepsy reaching up to 0.5% of the Gross National Product (GNP) in some cases. Difficulties in the appropriate diagnosis and treatment are complicated by the lack of trained medical specialists. Therefore, in these conditions, adopting artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions may improve epilepsy care in LMICs. In this theoretical and critical review, we focus on epilepsy and its management in LMICs, as well as on the employment of AI technologies to aid epilepsy care in LMICs. We begin with a general introduction of epilepsy and present basic diagnostic and treatment approaches. We then explore the socioeconomic impact, treatment gaps, and efforts made to mitigate these issues. Taking this step further, we examine recent AI-related developments and their potential as assistive tools in clinical application in LMICs, along with proposals for future directions. We conclude by suggesting the need for scalable, low-cost AI solutions that align with the local infrastructure, policy and community engagement to improve epilepsy care in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.