ReviewBiomedicines2025
Hearts, Data, and Artificial Intelligence Wizardry: From Imitation to Innovation in Cardiovascular Care.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Prediction and Detection of Atrial Fibrillation from Sinus-Rhythm Electrocardiograms and Ambulatory Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Unsupervised machine learning for cardiovascular disease: A framework for future studies.European journal of heart failure · 2025Review
- The "Now" and "Next" in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Cognitive alignment in cardiovascular AI: designing predictive models that think with, not just for, clinicians.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Editorial: Artificial intelligence for arrhythmia detection and prediction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming cardiovascular medicine by enabling the analysis of high-dimensional biomedical data with unprecedented precision. Initially employed to automate human tasks such as electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation and imaging segmentation, AI's true potential lies in uncovering hidden disease data patterns, predicting long-term cardiovascular risk, and personalizing treatments. Unlike human cognition, which excels in certain tasks but is limited by memory and processing constraints, AI integrates multimodal data sources-including ECG, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, genomics, and wearable sensor data-to generate novel clinical insights. AI models have demonstrated remarkable success in early dis-ease detection, such as predicting heart failure from standard ECGs before symptom on-set, distinguishing genetic cardiomyopathies, and forecasting arrhythmic events. However, several challenges persist, including AI's lack of contextual understanding in most of these tasks, its "black-box" nature, and biases in training datasets that may contribute to disparities in healthcare delivery. Ethical considerations and regulatory frameworks are evolving, with governing bodies establishing guidelines for AI-driven medical applications. To fully harness the potential of AI, interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, data scientists, and engineers is essential, alongside open science initiatives to promote data accessibility and reproducibility. Future AI models must go beyond task automation, focusing instead on augmenting human expertise to enable proactive, precision-driven cardiovascular care. By embracing AI's computational strengths while addressing its limitations, cardiology is poised to enter an era of transformative innovation beyond traditional diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.