ReviewCancers2025
Deep Learning to Enhance Diagnosis and Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiphasic Evidential Decision-Making Matrix (MedMax) for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Center Validation Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Advances in In Vitro Diagnostics for Cholangiocarcinoma: From Biomarker Discovery to Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is associated with a poor prognosis and necessitates a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach from diagnosis to treatment to achieve optimal outcomes. A noninvasive preoperative diagnosis using abdominal imaging techniques can represent a clinical challenge. Given the differential response of iCCA to localized and systemic therapies compared with hepatocellular carcinoma and secondary hepatic malignancies, an accurate diagnosis is crucial. Deep learning (DL) models for image analysis have emerged as a promising adjunct for the abdominal radiologist, potentially enhancing the accurate detection and diagnosis of iCCA. Over the last five years, several reports have proposed robust DL models, which demonstrate a diagnostic accuracy that is either comparable to or surpasses that of radiologists with varying levels of experience. Recent studies have expanded DL applications into other aspects of iCCA management, including histopathologic diagnosis, the prediction of histopathological features, the preoperative prediction of survival, and the pretreatment prediction of responses to systemic therapy. We herein critically evaluate the expanding body of research on DL applications in the diagnosis and management of iCCA, providing insights into the current progress and future research directions. We comprehensively synthesize the performance and limitations of DL models in iCCA research, identifying key challenges that serve as a translational reference for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.