Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427364›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Search for Ancient Selection Traces in Faverolle Chicken Breed (

Anna E Ryabova, Anastasiia I Azovtseva, Yuri S Shcherbakov, Artem P Dysin, Natalia V Dementieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna E RyabovaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2362-2892
Anastasiia I AzovtsevaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-378X
Yuri S ShcherbakovRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6434-6287
Artem P DysinRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4468-0365
Natalia V DementievaRussian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding (RRIFAGB)-Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Centre for Animal Husbandry, Pushkin, St. Petersburg 196601, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-9344

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-16-00174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Runs of homozygosity (ROHs) are continuous homozygous segments of genomes that can be used to infer the historical development of the population. ROH studies allow us to analyze the genetic structure of a population and identify signs of selection. The present study searched for ROH regions in the Faverolle chicken breed. DNA samples from modern individuals and museum Faverolle specimens were obtained and sent for whole-genome sequencing (WGS) with 30× coverage. The results were aligned to the reference genome and subjected to additional filtering. ROH segments were then analyzed using PLINK 1.9. As a result, 10 regions on GGA1, 2, 3, 4, and 13 were identified. A total of 19 genes associated with fat deposition and lipid metabolism (

Indexed as

Faverollesgenome architecturemeat qualityruns of homozygosityselection traceswhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40427364
PMCPMC12108394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.