ArticleBiology2025
Bioinformatic Analysis of Complex In Vitro Fertilization Data and Predictive Model Design Based on Machine Learning: The Age Paradox in Reproductive Health.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Co-Occurring Clinical and Treatment Characteristics Associated with In Vitro Fertilization Failure in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Association Rule Mining Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- The Influence of Pre-IVF Day 2 TSH Levels on Treatment Success and Obstetric Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis with Machine Learning-Based Data Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Building a predictive model for pregnancy outcomes in ART patients based on AMH, FORT, HCG day EMT, and clinical characteristics.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its inception in 1987, in vitro fertilization (IVF) has constituted a significant medical achievement in the field of fertility treatment, offering a viable solution to the challenge of infertility. The continuous evolution of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has brought its relationship with the rapidly developing field of artificial intelligence (AI), in particular with techniques such as machine learning (ML), a rapidly evolving area of specialization. In fact, it is responsible for significant developments in the field of precision medicine, as well as in preventive and predictive medicine. The analysis focuses on a large volume of clinical data and patient characteristics of those who underwent assisted reproduction treatments. Concurrently, the utilization of machine learning algorithms has facilitated the development and implementation of predictive models. The objective is to predict the success of treatments for external fertilization based on processed clinical data. This study encompasses statistical analysis techniques and artificial intelligence algorithms for the correlation of variables, such as patient characteristics, the history of pregnancies, and the clinical and embryological parameters. The analysis and creation of prognostic models were compared with the objective of identifying factors that influence the outcome of IVF treatments. The potential for implementing a predictive model in routine clinical practice was also investigated. The findings revealed trends and factors that warrant attention. Such findings may prompt questions regarding the impact of the patient's age on treatment efficacy. Moreover, the value of developing a predictive model based entirely on patient data prior to the commencement of treatment was also investigated. This approach to the processing and utilization of clinical data demonstrates the potential for optimization and documentation of therapeutic procedures. The objective is to reduce costs and the emotional burden while increasing the success rate of IVF treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.