ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
From "Eating for Two" to Food Insecurity: Understanding Weight Gain Perspective During Pregnancy Among Malaysian Women.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesGestational weight gain (GWG) is a critical determinant of pregnancy outcomes; however, studies on factors contributing to suboptimal GWG in developing countries, including Malaysia, remain limited.
methodsThis study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, with the quantitative phase conducted between January and March 2020, followed by the qualitative phase from July 2020 to March 2021 in Selangor. The qualitative phase aimed to explain the factors influencing suboptimal (inadequate and excessive) GWG identified in the quantitative phase. Inclusion criteria included Malaysian women aged 18 and above who had suboptimal GWG (either inadequate or excessive) from the quantitative phase. Exclusion criteria included women who refused participation. Of the 475 participants from the quantitative phase, 20 with suboptimal GWG were purposively selected for in-depth telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview protocol. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsThree key themes emerged: (1) the impact of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity, shaped by unhealthy lifestyles, social influences, and limited access to nutritious food and physical activity; (2) the management of diabetes during pregnancy, contributing to inadequate GWG due to psychological responses, restrictive behaviours, and barriers to dietary guidance; and (3) financial constraints in middle- and low-income households, leading to income vulnerability, financial crises, and food insecurity.
conclusionsThis finding highlights the urgent need for targeted interventions to optimize GWG, emphasizing pre-pregnancy health optimization, enhanced diabetes management, and strategies to mitigate financial constraints and food insecurity among pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.