ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Decoding Depression from Different Brain Regions Using Hybrid Machine Learning Methods.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG Unpredictability in the Resting State of Major Depressive Disorder: A Multidomain EEG Analysis.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Resting-state EEG dual biomarker for motor-cognitive function in elderly individuals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating Cortical Source Reconstruction and Adversarial Learning for EEG Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characteristic brain function and network activity patterns in adolescent first-episode depression: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression has become one of the most common mental illnesses, causing severe physical and mental harm. To clarify the impact of brain region segmentation on the detection accuracy of moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD) and identify the optimal brain region for detecting MDD using electroencephalography (EEG), this study compared eight traditional single-machine learning algorithms with a hybrid machine learning model based on a stacking ensemble technique. The hybrid model employed K-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) as base learners and used a DT as the meta-learner. Compared with traditional single methods, the hybrid approach significantly improved detection accuracy by leveraging the strengths of different algorithms. In addition, this study divided the brain regions into the left and right temporal lobes and extracted both linear and nonlinear features to comprehensively capture the complexity and dynamic behavior of EEG signals, enhancing the model's ability to distinguish features across different brain regions. The experimental results showed that among the eight traditional machine learning methods, the KNN classifier achieved the highest detection accuracy of 96.97% in the left temporal lobe region. In contrast, the stacking hybrid learning model further increased the detection accuracy to 98.07%, significantly outperforming the single models. Moreover, the analysis of the brain region segmentation revealed that the left temporal lobe exhibited higher discriminative power in detecting MDD, highlighting its important role in the neurobiology of depression. This study provides a solid foundation for developing more efficient and portable methods for detecting depression, offering new perspectives and approaches for EEG-based MDD detection, and contributing to the improvement in objectivity and precision in depression diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.