ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bioengineered Approaches for Esophageal Regeneration: Advancing Esophageal Cancer Therapy.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Replicating the post-chemotherapy tumor microenvironmentRSC advances · 2026Article
- Organ Preservation in Esophageal Cancer: Current Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, largely due to its late-stage diagnosis and aggressive progression. Esophagectomy remains the primary treatment, typically requiring organ-based reconstruction techniques such as gastric pull-up or colonic interposition. However, these reconstruction methods often lead to severe complications, significantly reducing the quality of life of patients. To address these limitations, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising alternative, offering bioengineered patch-type and tubular-type scaffolds designed to restore both structural integrity and functional regeneration. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) biofabrication-including 3D bioprinting, electrospinning, and other cutting-edge techniques-have facilitated the development of patient-specific constructs with improved biocompatibility. Despite significant advancements, critical challenges persist in achieving mechanical durability, multilayered cellular organization, and physiological resilience post-transplantation. Ongoing research continues to address these limitations and enhance clinical applicability. Therefore, this review aims to examine recent advancements in esophageal tissue engineering, with a focus on key biofabrication techniques, preclinical animal models, and the major translational challenges that must be addressed for successful clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.