Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428295›Full record

ArticleGenes2025

Enhancing Prognostic Signatures in Glioblastoma with Feature Selection and Regularised Cox Regression.

Beatriz N Leitão, André Veríssimo, Alexandra M Carvalho, Susana Vinga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beatriz N LeitãoInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento (INESC-ID), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0005-4147-9358
André VeríssimoAppsilon, Data for Good, 00-020 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2212-339X
Alexandra M CarvalhoInstituto de Telecomunicações (IT-Lisboa), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6607-7711
Susana VingaInstituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores: Investigação e Desenvolvimento (INESC-ID), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1000-029 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1954-5487

Funding

EU Horizon 2020 951970Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia 10.54499/2024.07252.IACDCFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia 2024.03867.BDFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/CCI-BIO/4180/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50008/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50021/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50022/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumour with poor survival outcomes, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic models. Developing robust and interpretable prognostic signatures is critical for improving patient stratification and guiding therapy. This study explored the integration of machine learning feature selection with regularised Cox regression to construct prognostic gene signatures for glioblastoma patients.

methodsWe combined the Boruta algorithm and Random Survival Forests (RSFs) with regularised Cox regression, along with network-based regularisation techniques (HubCox and OrphanCox), to develop interpretable prognostic signatures for stratifying high- and low-risk glioblastoma patients. Using mRNA-seq and survival data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we developed predictive models following WHO-2021 glioma guidelines.

resultsIntegrating Boruta or RSF with regularised Cox regression improved the performance and interpretability. Boruta increased the concordance indexes (C-indexes) by 0.030 and 0.013 for LASSO and Elastic Net, respectively, while significantly reducing the feature numbers. RSF similarly enhanced the performance and feature reduction. The genes Lysyl Oxidase Like 1 (

conclusionsThis study underscored the utility of combining machine learning feature selection with survival analysis to enhance prognostic modelling while balancing predictive performance and interpretability.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMachine LearningPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsTranscriptomeBiomarkers, Tumorcancer biomarkersmachine learningnetwork-based regularisationprecision oncologyprognostic modelssurvival analysisTCGA

Identifiers

PMID40428295
PMCPMC12111402

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.