ReviewGenes2025
A Novel Frameshift Variant and a Partial
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKleefstra syndrome 1(KLEFS1, OMIM#610253) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) instigated by heterozygous variants or microdeletions occurring in the 9q34.4 genomic region of the euchromatic histone methyltransferase-1 (
methodsExome sequencing (ES), chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), as well as sanger sequencing, for confirmation of the de novo status of the frameshift variant, were used.
resultsHere we describe two more cases, both males with a similar age and carriers of novel variants; one with a frameshift variant involving exon 13: p.Val692Glyfs*64 and the other with the smallest so far described, 11 Kb (exons 19-25), 9q34.4 microdeletion: 9q34.3 (140703393-140714454). Both presented with an NDD disorder with one showing more severe ID with significant social disabilities, while the other with the microdeletion had mild ID and following a normal education curriculum. Neither of them were obese nor had any other significant organ system disorder.
conclusionsThe observed phenotypic variability due to genotypic differences in the two children contributes to the expanding spectrum of KLEFS1 disease phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.