ReviewGenes2025
Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing.
Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embryo selection by non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in women of advanced maternal age: a randomized, clinical trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Observational
- Review
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (niPGT) Compared to Invasive Embryo Biopsy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Navigating Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (niPGT-A) - Technical Challenges and Ethical Considerations.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To minimise the influence of chromosomal abnormalities during IVF treatment, embryos can be screened before transfer using preimplantation genetic testing. This typically involves an invasive trophectoderm biopsy at the blastocyst stage, where 4-8 cells are collected and analysed. However, emerging evidence indicates that, as embryos develop in vitro in culture media, they release cell-free DNA into the media, providing an alternative source of genetic material that can be accessed non-invasively. Spent blastocyst media samples that contain embryo cell-free DNA demonstrate high informativity rates and ploidy concordance when compared with the corresponding trophectoderm, inner cell mass, or whole blastocyst results. However, optimising this non-invasive approach requires several changes to embryo culture protocols, including additional embryo washes to tackle contamination and extending embryo culture time to maximise the amount of cell-free DNA released into the culture media. In this review, we discuss this novel non-invasive approach for aneuploidy detection and embryo prioritisation, as well as the current data and future prospects for utilising cell-free DNA analysis to identify structural rearrangements and single gene disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.