Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428866›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Multimodal Prehabilitation in Major Abdominal Surgery-Rationale, Modalities, Results and Limitations.

George Andrei Popescu, Dana Galieta Minca, Nader Mugurel Jafal, Cristian Valentin Toma, Sorin Tiberiu Alexandrescu, Radu Virgil Costea, Catalin Vasilescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George Andrei PopescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-1200-0301
Dana Galieta MincaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Nader Mugurel JafalFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0001-9872-7587
Cristian Valentin TomaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4396-8081
Sorin Tiberiu AlexandrescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-2769
Radu Virgil CosteaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0509-693X
Catalin VasilescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bulevardul Eroii Sanitari 8, Sector 5, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence revealed that an adequate preoperative physiological reserve is crucial to overcome surgical stress response. Consequently, a new concept, called prehabilitation, emerged, aiming to improve the preoperative functional reserve of patients who will undergo major abdominal surgery. During the interval between diagnosis and surgery, a multimodal approach consisting of physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support could be employed to enhance physiologic reserve. Physical activity interventions aim to improve aerobic capacity, muscle strength and endurance. Nutritional support addressing malnutrition and sarcopenia also contributes to the achievement of the above-mentioned goals, particularly in patients undergoing cancer-related procedures. Psychological interventions targeting anxiety, depression and self-efficacy, as well as risk behavior modification (e.g., smoking cessation) seem to enhance recovery. However, there is a lack of standardization regarding these interventions, and the evidence about the impact of this multidisciplinary approach on the postoperative outcomes is still contradictory. This narrative review focuses on the physiological basis of surgical stress response and on the efficacy of prehabilitation, reflected mainly in the length of hospitalization and rates of postoperative complications. Multidisciplinary collaboration between surgeons, nutritionists, psychologists and physiotherapists was identified as the key to the success of prehabilitation programs. Synergizing prehabilitation and ERAS protocols significantly improves short-term surgical outcomes. Recent well-designed, randomized clinical trials revealed that this approach not only enhanced functional reserve, but also decreased the rates of postoperative complications and enhanced patient's overall quality of life, emphasizing the importance of its implementation in routine, elective, surgical care.

Indexed as

AbdomenPreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseCombined Modality TherapyHumansPostoperative Complicationsabdominal surgeryenhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)exercise interventionnutritional supportphysiological reserveprehabilitationsurgical stress

Identifiers

PMID40428866
PMCPMC12113638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.