ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
We Need to Talk About Quality of Life with Cancer Patients: Primum Non Nocere in Oncology.
Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of risk factors and prognostic prediction in advanced colorectal cancer undergoing immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Hippocratic principle primum non nocere, or "first, do no harm", serves as a vital lens through which to re-evaluate modern oncology practices. While recent advances such as immunotherapy, targeted agents, and precision medicine have transformed cancer care, these treatments are not without risk. Even with improved tolerability, they may still lead to substantial toxicities, particularly in frail patients with advanced cancer. The pursuit of survival often overshadows the patient's quality of life, with aggressive interventions frequently continuing beyond the point of meaningful benefit. This perspective article argues for a more individualized and ethically grounded approach to cancer treatment, emphasizing the careful assessment of each patient's clinical status, values, and goals. By integrating geriatric and palliative assessments, improving shared decision making, and moving away from a default treatment-at-all-costs mindset, clinicians can better align care with what truly matters to patients. Honoring primum non nocere in oncology means not only extending life when appropriate but ensuring that life remains worth living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.