Evidence mapPaperPMID 40429442Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

From Circulating Biomarkers to Polymorphic Variants: A Narrative Review of Challenges in Thrombophilia Evaluation.

Giuseppe Miceli, Anna Maria Ciaccio, Antonino Tuttolomondo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coagulation Markers and Myocardial Blush Grade in STEMI: Identifying Potential Predictors of Microvascular Reperfusion.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giuseppe MiceliDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE) Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-2523
Anna Maria CiaccioDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE) Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Antonino TuttolomondoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE) Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-7318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thrombophilia is characterized by a hypercoagulable state that predisposes individuals to venous and arterial thrombotic events, posing significant challenges for clinical evaluation and management. This narrative review critically examines the current landscape of thrombophilia testing, focusing on the utility and limitations of both circulating and genetic biomarkers. Circulating biomarkers-such as D-dimer, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S-offer dynamic insights into the coagulation process yet often suffer from low specificity in varied clinical settings. In contrast, genetic biomarkers, notably Factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutation, provide stable risk stratification but are limited by their low prevalence in the general population. Emerging markers, including selectins, Factor VIII, Factor XI, neutrophil extracellular traps, and extracellular vesicles, are also discussed for their potential to refine thrombotic risk assessment. By integrating evidence-based guidelines from international health organizations, this review underscores the need for a personalized approach to thrombophilia evaluation that balances comprehensive risk assessment with the avoidance of over-testing. Such an approach is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and informing the duration and intensity of anticoagulant therapy.

Indexed as

circulating biomarkersD-dimerFactor V Leidengenetic biomarkersguidelinespersonalized medicineprothrombin G20210Arisk stratificationthrombophiliathrombosis

Identifiers

PMID40429442
PMCPMC12111975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.