ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
From Circulating Biomarkers to Polymorphic Variants: A Narrative Review of Challenges in Thrombophilia Evaluation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venous Thromboembolism and Gut Dysbiosis: Mechanistic Links Between Endotoxemia, Microbial Metabolites, and Thromboinflammation.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Type 2 Diabetes Is Associated with Increased Coagulation Activity in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A D-Dimer-Based Analysis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Correlations of Glycaemic Index and Estimated Whole Blood Viscosity with Blood Cell Indices in Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Clinical Laboratory Medicine Observational Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A case report of massive pulmonary embolism in a pregnant woman with undiagnosed thrombophilia: Management strategies and timing for thrombophilia screening.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Coagulation Markers and Myocardial Blush Grade in STEMI: Identifying Potential Predictors of Microvascular Reperfusion.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thrombophilia is characterized by a hypercoagulable state that predisposes individuals to venous and arterial thrombotic events, posing significant challenges for clinical evaluation and management. This narrative review critically examines the current landscape of thrombophilia testing, focusing on the utility and limitations of both circulating and genetic biomarkers. Circulating biomarkers-such as D-dimer, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S-offer dynamic insights into the coagulation process yet often suffer from low specificity in varied clinical settings. In contrast, genetic biomarkers, notably Factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutation, provide stable risk stratification but are limited by their low prevalence in the general population. Emerging markers, including selectins, Factor VIII, Factor XI, neutrophil extracellular traps, and extracellular vesicles, are also discussed for their potential to refine thrombotic risk assessment. By integrating evidence-based guidelines from international health organizations, this review underscores the need for a personalized approach to thrombophilia evaluation that balances comprehensive risk assessment with the avoidance of over-testing. Such an approach is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and informing the duration and intensity of anticoagulant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.