ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Epigenetic Clocks and EpiScore for Preventive Medicine: Risk Stratification and Intervention Models for Age-Related Diseases.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From the lab to lifestyle: epigenetic clocks in personalized aging and health.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Translational Geroscience Strategies for Delaying Multimorbidity.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- EpigeneticAgePipeline: An R Package for Comprehensive Assessment of Epigenetic Age Metrics From Methylation Microarrays.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- Advances in anti-aging Drug research leveraging multi-omics and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in aging · 2026Review
- Editorial: Alleviating age-related disease burden.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Reprogramming cellular senescence and aging clocks for advanced cancer immunotherapy.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Aging is the primary risk factor for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and dementia. However, chronological age alone fails to capture individual variability in aging trajectories and disease susceptibility. Recent advances in epigenetic clocks-DNA methylation-based models that estimate biological age-have opened new possibilities for personalized and preventive medicine. This review explores the clinical potential of epigenetic clocks and EpiScores, composite biomarkers that predict health risks and physiological status. We present a comparative evaluation of widely used epigenetic clocks, including Horvath, GrimAge, PhenoAge, and DunedinPACE, and summarize their predictive performance for mortality, cognitive decline, and cardiovascular outcomes. EpiScores linked to inflammation, glycemic control, and immunosenescence are highlighted as tools for stratified risk assessment. When integrated with multi-omics data and electronic health records, these measures enhance the precision of population health management. Special emphasis is placed on applications in longevity clinics and anti-aging clinics, community-based care, and national health checkup systems. We also explore global standardization efforts and ethical considerations, as well as Japan's unique initiatives-including the "Aging Measurement" project at the Osaka-Kansai Expo 2025. Furthermore, we propose the development of a Global Health and Aging Index that integrates the biological, functional, and subjective dimensions of aging, aligned with the WHO concept of Intrinsic Capacity. In conclusion, epigenetic clocks and EpiScores represent transformative tools for shifting from reactive treatment to proactive health optimization, and from chronological to biological metrics in aging science and public health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.