Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40429598›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Epigenetic Clocks and EpiScore for Preventive Medicine: Risk Stratification and Intervention Models for Age-Related Diseases.

Hidekazu Yamada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Translational Geroscience Strategies for Delaying Multimorbidity.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hidekazu YamadaKindai University Anti-Aging Center, 3 Chome-5-25 Hoji, Higashiosaka 577-0805, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

kindai University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is the primary risk factor for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and dementia. However, chronological age alone fails to capture individual variability in aging trajectories and disease susceptibility. Recent advances in epigenetic clocks-DNA methylation-based models that estimate biological age-have opened new possibilities for personalized and preventive medicine. This review explores the clinical potential of epigenetic clocks and EpiScores, composite biomarkers that predict health risks and physiological status. We present a comparative evaluation of widely used epigenetic clocks, including Horvath, GrimAge, PhenoAge, and DunedinPACE, and summarize their predictive performance for mortality, cognitive decline, and cardiovascular outcomes. EpiScores linked to inflammation, glycemic control, and immunosenescence are highlighted as tools for stratified risk assessment. When integrated with multi-omics data and electronic health records, these measures enhance the precision of population health management. Special emphasis is placed on applications in longevity clinics and anti-aging clinics, community-based care, and national health checkup systems. We also explore global standardization efforts and ethical considerations, as well as Japan's unique initiatives-including the "Aging Measurement" project at the Osaka-Kansai Expo 2025. Furthermore, we propose the development of a Global Health and Aging Index that integrates the biological, functional, and subjective dimensions of aging, aligned with the WHO concept of Intrinsic Capacity. In conclusion, epigenetic clocks and EpiScores represent transformative tools for shifting from reactive treatment to proactive health optimization, and from chronological to biological metrics in aging science and public health policy.

Indexed as

agingbiological ageepigenetic clockEpiScoremulti-omicspreventive medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID40429598
PMCPMC12112696

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.