Evidence mapPaperPMID 40429652Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Recent Studies and Prospects of Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment.

Xiangning Cheng, Yue Zhou, Yuzhe Hao, Ziyi Long, Qianxue Hu, Bingyue Huo, Tianjian Xie, Shan Chen, Liuqing Zhou, Tao Zhou and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xiangning ChengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Yue ZhouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Yuzhe HaoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Ziyi LongDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Qianxue HuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Bingyue HuoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Tianjian XieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Shan ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Liuqing ZhouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Tao ZhouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Liyue LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Qing ChengDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Jianjun ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Program of China No.2022YFC2504100the National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82371124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common and increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa that severely impacts patients' quality of life, causing symptoms like nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching. AR is primarily mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) when allergens are present, making it challenging to manage despite available therapies like pharmacotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. Recently, research has focused on biologics as an emerging therapeutic option for AR. Biologics target specific immune pathways in type 2 inflammation, which underlies many allergic diseases including AR. Biologics offer a targeted and potentially more effective alternative to traditional therapies, addressing the underlying immune mechanisms rather than simply alleviating symptoms. Based on key clinical trial evidence, this paper tentatively proposes a multidimensional strategy for selecting biologics in AR, integrating serum IgE levels, disease phenotypes (seasonal/persistent), and comorbid characteristics to guide individualized treatment. However, the long-term cost-effectiveness, optimal dosing regimens, and patient adherence to biologics require further validation through real-world data. Despite these challenges, recent advancements in biologics represent a promising step forward in AR management. With ongoing research and clinical trials, biologics may soon provide more effective and lasting relief for patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsRhinitis, AllergicHumansImmunoglobulin EBiological ProductsImmunoglobulin Eallergic rhinitisbiologicstherapy

Identifiers

PMID40429652
PMCPMC12111765

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.