ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Recent Studies and Prospects of Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of probiotics on allergic rhinitis in children; A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Unhealthy sleep patterns and irregular night shift work are associated with increased risk of allergic rhinitis: a large prospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Toward personalized prediction: a multicenter machine learning model for omalizumab response duration in moderate-to-severe perennial allergic rhinitis.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Systemic Immune Dysregulation in Allergic Rhinitis: Mechanisms, Comorbidities, and Implications for Targeted Therapy.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Review
- Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Immunomodulatory Strategies for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Gut microbiome modulation in allergic rhinitis: from current evidence to emerging therapies.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Unravelling allergic rhinitis: exploring pathophysiology, advances in treatment, and future directions.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common and increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa that severely impacts patients' quality of life, causing symptoms like nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching. AR is primarily mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) when allergens are present, making it challenging to manage despite available therapies like pharmacotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. Recently, research has focused on biologics as an emerging therapeutic option for AR. Biologics target specific immune pathways in type 2 inflammation, which underlies many allergic diseases including AR. Biologics offer a targeted and potentially more effective alternative to traditional therapies, addressing the underlying immune mechanisms rather than simply alleviating symptoms. Based on key clinical trial evidence, this paper tentatively proposes a multidimensional strategy for selecting biologics in AR, integrating serum IgE levels, disease phenotypes (seasonal/persistent), and comorbid characteristics to guide individualized treatment. However, the long-term cost-effectiveness, optimal dosing regimens, and patient adherence to biologics require further validation through real-world data. Despite these challenges, recent advancements in biologics represent a promising step forward in AR management. With ongoing research and clinical trials, biologics may soon provide more effective and lasting relief for patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.