ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Quantum Paradox in Pharmaceutical Science: Understanding Without Comprehending-A Centennial Reflection.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery from advanced molecular representation to pipeline applications.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A comprehensive application of FiveFold for conformation ensemble-based protein structure prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Review
- Protein Catalysis Through Structural Dynamics: A Comprehensive Analysis of Energy Conversion in Enzymatic Systems and Its Computational Limitations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dynamic energy conversion in protein catalysis: From brownian motion to enzymatic function.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Schrödinger equation, Heisenberg's uncertainty principles, and the Boltzmann constant represent transformative scientific achievements, the impacts of which extend far beyond their original domain of physics. As we celebrate the centenary of these fundamental quantum mechanical formulations, this review examines their evolution from abstract mathematical concepts to essential tools in contemporary drug discovery and development. While these principles describe the behavior of subatomic particles and molecules at the quantum level, they have profound implications for understanding biological processes such as enzyme catalysis, receptor-ligand interactions, and drug-target binding. Quantum tunneling, a direct consequence of these principles, explains how some reactions occur despite classical energy barriers, enabling novel therapeutic approaches for previously untreatable diseases. This understanding of quantum mechanics from 100 years ago is now creating innovative approaches to drug discovery with diverse prospects, as explored in this review. However, the fact that the quantum phenomenon can be described but never understood places us in a conundrum with both philosophical and ethical implications; a prospective and inconclusive discussion of these aspects is added to ensure the incompleteness of the paradigm remains unshifted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.