ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Optimizing Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer: Unveiling New Markers for Clinical Applications.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Cell-Surface Vimentin Positive Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer Using an Automated Negative Selection Platform.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrative transcriptomic profiling of tumor patients in surgical ICU: identifying prognostic immune signatures.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Assessment of Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) as a Tool to Characterize Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Preclinical Mouse Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with high metastasis potential, especially in the bones, liver, and lungs. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which emerge from active tumors, represent an early step toward metastasis and are associated with poor prognosis. CTCs of carcinoma origin are believed to express EpCAM and cytokeratins (CKs), common epithelial markers that are frequently used to identify them. However, in practice, the most aggressive CTCs lose the expression of those markers, leading to the partial loss of important information. Thus, finding some novel markers that identify CTCs regardless of their heterogeneity is crucial. A specific bioinformatics workflow integrating primary tumor and diverse BC cell lines transcriptomic expression analysis was developed and compared with single CTC transcriptomic analyses. We have identified a set of genes that are overexpressed in primary BC cells and are commonly upregulated among BC cell lines. Fifty of them were also found to be expressed in BC CTCs by single-cell transcriptomic analysis. Further in silico sorting narrowed this list to 12 genes. Using ScreenCell technology to isolate cancer cells spiked into normal blood, we tested the protein expression of all corresponding genes in vitro using the double immunocytochemistry method and validated MARCKSL1, SLC9A3R1, and RHOD as the most expressed markers. We then isolated the CTCs of 40 LN-invaded BC patients and 18 healthy donors using ScreenCell technology and showed that the combination of these three markers resulted in significantly better recognition of CTCs compared to EpCAM and CK conventional markers. Employing these novel markers, we found a clear distinction between blood samples from patients and healthy donors. In conclusion, through a specific bioinformatics workflow, in addition to in vitro and further clinical validations, we found three novel markers to precisely identify CTCs. These markers, when used together, enable a significantly more efficient identification of CTCs compared to conventional epithelial markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.