Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40430371›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Development of High-Pressure Extraction and Automatic Steam Distillation Methods for

Sara Lahoff, Ezra E Cable, Ryan Buzzetto-More, Victoria V Volkis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara LahoffDepartment of Natural Sciences, The University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA.
Ezra E CableDepartment of Natural Sciences, The University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA.
Ryan Buzzetto-MoreDepartment of Natural Sciences, The University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA.
Victoria V VolkisDepartment of Natural Sciences, The University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8415-0134

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture 1016197United States Department of Agriculture 2020-69018-30655United States Department of Agriculture 2021-38821-34601United States Department of Agriculture 2023-69018-41014United States Department of Agriculture 7004559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample preparation is the most time-consuming part of phytochemical, agricultural chemical, and food science studies and is constantly being improved. This includes the development of modern extraction methods, such as high-pressure extraction and automatic steam distillation. These methods feature high reproducibility, low time consumption, and the ability to run several parallel samples. However, the ideal parameters for processing plant materials using these methods have not been fully explored. These parameters include those that produce the highest yield and those that produce yields comparable to less modern extraction techniques, which would allow for a comparison of data to a wide range of preexisting data obtained from plant materials in different growing locations and climates. As such, this study examined extracts produced by reflux extraction, high-pressure extraction, and traditional and automatic steam distillation for three plants: aronia, holy basil, and juvenile ginger. High-pressure extraction methods were developed to produce extracts similar to those produced by reflux extraction, while automatic distillation methods were developed to produce high essential oil yields. The automatic steam distillation yields were 55.81 ± 1.97 mg/g of holy basil, 61.52 ± 0.61 mg/g of ginger, and 45.79 ± 1.38 mg/g of aronia. The high-pressure extraction yields were 11.09 ± 1.46 mg GAE/g of holy basil, 154.50 ± 17.10 mg of anthocyanins/mL of aronia, 6.60 ± 0.55 mg GAE/g of ginger, and 3.27 ± 0.25 mg GAE/g of ginger. These were compared to reflux yields of 32.71 ± 5.22 mg GAE/g of holy basil, 253.00 ± 39.56 mg of anthocyanin/mL of aronia, and 3.34 ± 2.07 mg GAE/g of ginger.

Indexed as

DistillationOcimum basilicumPlant ExtractsZingiber officinaleOils, VolatilePhytochemicalsPressureSteamOils, VolatilePhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsSteamAronia mitschuriniiautomatic steam distillationextraction methodshigh-pressure extractionholy basiljuvenile gingernonpolar solventspolar solvents

Identifiers

PMID40430371
PMCPMC12113872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.