ArticlePolymers2025
Morphology Design and Precision Control of Microneedles by PμSL 3D Printing.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly cited original research in microneedle science from 2015 to 2025 a bibliometric and altmetric analysis.Discover nano · 2026Review
- A Dissolving Microneedle Design for Poorly Water-Soluble Drugs for Enhanced Skin Permeation and Transdermal Delivery Fabricated Using 3D Printing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Rational Design and Responsive Transdermal Cargo Delivery of Microneedles in the Treatment of Melanoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Evolution of 3D-Printed Microneedles toward Closed-Loop Theranostic Platforms.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Mechanisms, Technologies, and Clinical Applications.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- Effect of Geometric Design on the Mechanical Performance of Digital Light Processing (DLP)-Printed Microneedles.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Polymeric 3D-Printed Microneedle Arrays for Non-Transdermal Drug Delivery and Diagnostics.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microneedles (MNs) hold significant potential for applications in transdermal drug delivery and biosensing. However, when traditional 3D printing technology is used for their manufacture, a substantial deviation in output size occurs. The effects of various parameters on the morphology of MNs produced through microscale 3D printing remain unclear. This study investigated the relationship between the design and fabrication of acrylic resin MNs and their output forms via a projection microstereolithography (PµSL) technology system. Modifying the shape parameters and array configurations elucidates the causes of size deviation and proposes a control strategy. This is particularly significant for the prototyping and mold manufacturing of MNs in relevant fields. This study indicates that a printing layer thickness of 10 µm optimally balances efficiency and clinical conversion requirements. Additionally, an exposure intensity of 65 mW/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.