Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40430843›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2025

A Review on the Stability Challenges of Advanced Biologic Therapeutics.

Sruthi Sarvepalli, Shashank Reddy Pasika, Vartika Verma, Anusha Thumma, Sandeep Bolla, Pavan Kumar Nukala, Arun Butreddy, Pradeep Kumar Bolla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sruthi SarvepalliCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St John's University, Queens, New York, NY 11439, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-7187-1909
Shashank Reddy PasikaDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research-Raebareli (NIPER-R), Raebareli 226002, India.
Vartika VermaLaboratory of Translational Research in Nanomedicines, Lifecare Innovations Private Limited, Lucknow 226021, India.
Anusha ThummaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA.
Sandeep BollaDepartment of Statistical Programming, Fortrea, Durham, NC 27709, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1717-4604
Pavan Kumar NukalaCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St John's University, Queens, New York, NY 11439, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7093-4886
Arun ButreddyDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0626-9751
Pradeep Kumar BollaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5049-3550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced biotherapeutic systems such as gene therapy, mRNA lipid nanoparticles, antibody-drug conjugates, fusion proteins, and cell therapy have proven to be promising platforms for delivering targeted biologic therapeutics. Preserving the intrinsic stability of these advanced therapeutics is essential to maintain their innate structure, functionality, and shelf life. Nevertheless, various challenges and obstacles arise during formulation development and throughout the storage period due to their complex nature and sensitivity to various stress factors. Key stability concerns include physical degradation and chemical instability due to various factors such as fluctuations in pH and temperature, which results in conformational and colloidal instabilities of the biologics, adversely affecting their quality and therapeutic efficacy. This review emphasizes key stability issues associated with these advanced biotherapeutic systems and approaches to identify and overcome them. In gene therapy, the brittleness of viral vectors and gene encapsulation limits their stability, requiring the use of stabilizers, excipients, and lyophilization. Keeping cells viable throughout the whole cell therapy process, from culture to final formulation, is still a major difficulty. In mRNA therapeutics, stabilization strategies such as the optimization of mRNA nucleotides and lipid compositions are used to address the instability of both the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles. Monoclonal antibodies are colloidally and conformationally unstable. Hence, buffers and stabilizers are useful to maintain stability. Although fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies share structural similarities, they show a similar pattern of instability. Antibody-drug conjugates possess issues with conjugation and linker stability. This review outlines the stability issues associated with advanced biotherapeutics and provides insights into the approaches to address these challenges.

Indexed as

antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs)biologicscell therapycolloidal instabilityconformational instabilityfusion proteinsgene therapymonoclonal antibodiesmRNA lipid nanoparticlesnon-viral vectorsstability concernsstabilization mechanismsstabilization strategiesviral vectors

Identifiers

PMID40430843
PMCPMC12114724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.