ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Validation of Low-Cost IMUs for Telerehabilitation Exercises.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning pipeline for detecting vestibular schwannoma patients with unilateral vestibular loss based on kinematic data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Virtual Reality Exergaming in Outpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review and Clinician Roadmap.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telerehabilitation, a specialized domain within telemedicine, supports remote physical rehabilitation and progress monitoring. Wearable sensors can improve this service by providing reliable monitoring of movement parameters, offering objective information into patients' rehabilitation sessions. This study presents the development and validation of a telerehabilitation system including a rehabilitation protocol, low-cost wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and a set of metrics descriptive of movement capacity to analyze rehabilitation exercises. Eleven medically stable elders (9 females, 2 males; age: 72.6 ± 5.0 years; height: 1.66 ± 0.09 m; mass: 67.8 ± 9.8 kg) performed 12 rehabilitation upper/lower limb and trunk exercises. Movement analysis was conducted using a prototypical IMU sensor and commercially available IMU as a reference. Each exercise was automatically segmented into single repetitions, from which selected metrics were computed. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate measurement agreement and consistency between the systems across all parameters. Results indicate acceptable measurement agreement for key rehabilitation metrics, including movement quantity, accelerations intensity, and movement smoothness. However, angular velocity and movement stability reveal technical limitations requiring refinement prior to clinical implementation. Balancing measurement reliability and affordability of telerehabilitation system remains a crucial factor to offer an effective service to individuals with diverse health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.