ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Food taboos among indigenous pregnant women of Khagrachari District, Bangladesh.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of Pregnancy-Related Misconceptions Among Pregnant Women in Urban Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Public health challenges · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore food taboos among indigenous pregnant women in Bangladesh. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted among the Tripura, Chakma, and Marma communities in Khagrachari district of Bangladesh. To identify the list of existing tabooed foods, six focus group discussions were conducted with 36 women aged 15 years and above. For the quantitative part, 75 indigenous pregnant women were interviewed face-to-face to identify the commonly avoided food items during their current pregnancy. All the interviews were conducted in the participant's native language. Results: A total of 64 different items were identified as tabooed food during pregnancy. Among the current pregnant, 46.6% were adhering to food taboos. The most commonly avoided fruits were pineapple (33.3%) and papaya (20.0%). For vegetables, organic sweet potato (4.0%) and pumpkin (2.6%) were the most common. For animal products, 8.0% of participants avoided fish of any kind, and 2.6% restricted duck meat. Cold food (4.0%) was the most avoided beverages and snacks. Betel leaf and nut (2.6%) were also in the list of tabooed food. Distinct locally grown Ghut Ghutte, Chinese yam, and wild yam were also refrained. The health and well-being of the baby were the main concerns behind the food taboos. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of food taboo practices among the indigenous pregnant women of Bangladesh. Tailored intervention programs to address misunderstandings, dispel myths, and encourage healthier food choices during pregnancy among the indigenous communities of Bangladesh can be beneficial for both pregnant and babies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.