Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40432831›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2025

Food taboos among indigenous pregnant women of Khagrachari District, Bangladesh.

Labanya Tripura, Shahrin Emdad Rayna, Anirban Chakma, Khan Mohammad Thouhidur Rahman, Md Syed Shariful Islam, Md Khalequzzaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Labanya TripuraDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1326-4672
Shahrin Emdad RaynaDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-672X
Anirban ChakmaDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-069X
Khan Mohammad Thouhidur RahmanDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-0797
Md Syed Shariful IslamDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md KhalequzzamanDepartment of Public Health and Informatics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-7469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore food taboos among indigenous pregnant women in Bangladesh. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted among the Tripura, Chakma, and Marma communities in Khagrachari district of Bangladesh. To identify the list of existing tabooed foods, six focus group discussions were conducted with 36 women aged 15 years and above. For the quantitative part, 75 indigenous pregnant women were interviewed face-to-face to identify the commonly avoided food items during their current pregnancy. All the interviews were conducted in the participant's native language. Results: A total of 64 different items were identified as tabooed food during pregnancy. Among the current pregnant, 46.6% were adhering to food taboos. The most commonly avoided fruits were pineapple (33.3%) and papaya (20.0%). For vegetables, organic sweet potato (4.0%) and pumpkin (2.6%) were the most common. For animal products, 8.0% of participants avoided fish of any kind, and 2.6% restricted duck meat. Cold food (4.0%) was the most avoided beverages and snacks. Betel leaf and nut (2.6%) were also in the list of tabooed food. Distinct locally grown Ghut Ghutte, Chinese yam, and wild yam were also refrained. The health and well-being of the baby were the main concerns behind the food taboos. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of food taboo practices among the indigenous pregnant women of Bangladesh. Tailored intervention programs to address misunderstandings, dispel myths, and encourage healthier food choices during pregnancy among the indigenous communities of Bangladesh can be beneficial for both pregnant and babies.

Indexed as

BangladeshFood tabooshill tractsindigenouspregnant women

Identifiers

PMID40432831
PMCPMC12106993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.