ReviewCJC open2025
Unraveling Heart Failure Phenotypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Peak Oxygen Uptake and Its Determinants.
Review in CJC open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CPET Characteristics in HFrEF, HFpEF and COPD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A non-linear pattern of exercise capacity in heart failure across ejection fraction categories.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Incidence of cardiovascular risk factors and exercise phenotyping in cardiomyopathies: One size does not fit all.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Mechanisms to Restore Function and Clinical Impact.Circulation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding the impact of heart failure (HF) phenotype on peak oxygen uptake (peak Methods: Studies comparing peak Results: After screening 3107 articles, 25 unique studies were included in the analysis for the primary outcome (HFrEF n = 3783; HFpEF n = 3279). Peak Conclusions: Our findings highlight distinct physiological impairments along the oxygen cascade in HFrEF compared with HFpEF, with direct implications for the management and treatment strategies of these HF subtypes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.