ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2024
Updates in pediatric upper extremity imaging.
Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimizing radiation exposure is crucial for both patient and provider safety. The harmful effects of ionizing radiation are well-documented. Further research is necessary to effectively decrease these risks. The present study compiles the most recent data available from orthopaedic surgery and radiology literature, with a focus on pediatric upper extremity imaging. The purpose of this study is to give a comprehensive update in order to improve patient and provider safety and guide future research.Radiographs are the most commonly employed imaging modality in the upper extremity, and there is a wealth of articles focusing on optimizing its use in pediatric patients. Recommendations include utilizing in-room fluoroscopy for final imaging after closed forearm fracture reduction in the emergency department and foregoing formal post-reduction radiographs. Additionally, literature supports that early postoperative radiographs and radiographs after pin removal in patients who have undergone closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures do not change management. Similarly, pediatric patients who have been treated for musculoskeletal infection do not require follow-up radiographs, in the absence of clinical concern. Other imaging modalities, such as ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have expanded their indications in pediatric upper extremity injuries in recent years. This includes ultrasound for diagnosing fractures and tendon pathologies, new CT technology that decreases radiation exposure, and MRI scans with potentially safer contrast agents.In summary, research has been expanding our understanding of radiation exposure and exploring ways to minimize this during pediatric upper extremity imaging. Further research is necessary to facilitate safer diagnostic tests in pediatric patients. Key Concepts: (1)Fluoroscopy should be utilized as definitive post-reduction imaging after closed reduction of pediatric forearm fractures.(2)Radiographs do not need to be obtained in the early-postoperative setting or after pin removal in patients who have undergone closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures.(3)Only obtain follow-up radiographs if there is a clinical concern in pediatric patients who have been treated for a musculoskeletal infection.(4)The application of ultrasound, CT scan, and MRI are continuing to expand and improve in pediatric upper extremity pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.