ArticleCurrent genomics2025
Article in Current genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CXCR6 and its correlated G protein-coupled receptors and PI3K-AKT pathways were associated with the progression of thyroid cancer.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Deciphering IFN signaling in gastric cancer: A single-cell and bulk transcriptomic integration reveals CXCR4 as a key immunomodulator and prognostic determinant.Translational oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Microtia, a prevalent congenital maxillofacial deformity, significantly impacts the physical and psychological health of children. Its etiology, especially in non-syndromic cases, remains a complex and partially understood domain, complicating etiological treatment. Recent studies pointed to a genetic predisposition in non-syndromic microtia, yet research on susceptible or pathogenic genes is limited. Objectives: This study focused on identifying key biomarker genes in microtia cartilage to elucidate pathogenesis and assist in prenatal diagnosis. Methods: We first collated two bulk transcriptome datasets from the GEO database, followed by functional enrichment analysis and Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to pinpoint differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and gene modules. The subsequent intersection of DEGs with WGCNA modules, aided by support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, predicted potential susceptibility genes for microtia. Finally, we integrated bulk RNA sequencing with single-cell data Results: We identified Conclusion: Our findings implicate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.