Evidence mapPaperPMID 40434299Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

A Remotely Delivered GLP-1RA-Supported Specialist Weight Management Program in Adults Living With Obesity: Retrospective Service Evaluation.

Rebecca Richards, Michael Whitman, Gina Wren, Peta Campion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca RichardsSecond Nature, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7122-6822
Michael WhitmanSecond Nature, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-7545
Gina WrenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9262-7043
Peta CampionSecond Nature, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-7047-7856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited access to specialist weight management services restricts the implementation of novel pharmacotherapies for obesity such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Second Nature, a commercial digital health company, offers a remotely delivered program combining a GLP-1RA medication (semaglutide) with digital behavioral support, potentially providing a scalable solution. However, evidence for long-term effectiveness in this real-world context is limited.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the 12-month effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and potential cost-effectiveness of the remotely delivered, semaglutide-supported weight management program by Second Nature.

methodsThis retrospective service evaluation analyzed data from participants who initiated the program between September and December 2023. The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months among participants with available data (completers). Secondary outcomes included retention, program engagement (measured by views of the Home screen in the app), behavioral changes, side effects, participant experience (qualitative analysis), and a comparative cost analysis against an NHS specialist weight management service. An "active subscription" was defined as maintaining a paid subscription for the full 12-month period. Descriptive statistics and paired 2-tailed t tests evaluated outcomes.

resultsData from 341 participants were included at baseline (282/341, 82.7% women; mean age 49, SD 11.1 years; mean baseline BMI 37.9, SD 6.9 kg/m

conclusionsThis evaluation suggests that remotely delivered GLP-1RA-supported weight management can achieve significant weight loss in participants remaining engaged for 12 months. However, the high rate of withdrawal limits generalizability. The program appears feasible, acceptable, and potentially cost-effective for completers. Further research, ideally in public health care settings using intent-to-treat analyses, is needed to confirm clinical outcomes, assess sustained results, and understand factors influencing retention.

Indexed as

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesObesityWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationRetrospective StudiesSemaglutideUnited KingdomWeight LossGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsGlucagon-Like PeptidesSemaglutidebehavioral interventioncost-effectivenessdigital healthGLP-1RAglucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistobesityreal-world evidenceremote health care deliverysemaglutideservice evaluationtelemedicineweight lossweight management

Identifiers

PMID40434299
PMCPMC12260464

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.